<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Veeam Backup &amp; Replication 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://veeammeup.com/2009/11/veeam-backup-replication-4.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://veeammeup.com/2009/11/veeam-backup-replication-4.html</link>
	<description>The Veeam Team</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://veeammeup.com/2009/11/veeam-backup-replication-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veeammeup.com/?p=176#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Hmm... out of interest, I went to your competitor&#039;s forum, and immediately noticed these threads (yes, they are either with ‘please contact our support’ ending - or no reply at all)
http://www.phdvirtual.com/forums?func=view&amp;id=1488&amp;catid=13#1488
http://www.phdvirtual.com/forums?func=view&amp;id=1731&amp;catid=13

Really strange that they make all this noise when having very real backup data integrity issues with their own product, and not just with restore - but with the actual backups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; out of interest, I went to your competitor&#8217;s forum, and immediately noticed these threads (yes, they are either with ‘please contact our support’ ending &#8211; or no reply at all)<br />
<a href="http://www.phdvirtual.com/forums?func=view&amp;id=1488&amp;catid=13#1488" rel="nofollow">http://www.phdvirtual.com/forums?func=view&amp;id=1488&amp;catid=13#1488</a><br />
<a href="http://www.phdvirtual.com/forums?func=view&amp;id=1731&amp;catid=13" rel="nofollow">http://www.phdvirtual.com/forums?func=view&amp;id=1731&amp;catid=13</a></p>
<p>Really strange that they make all this noise when having very real backup data integrity issues with their own product, and not just with restore &#8211; but with the actual backups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://veeammeup.com/2009/11/veeam-backup-replication-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veeammeup.com/?p=176#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Your competitors are simply desperate :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your competitors are simply desperate <img src='http://veeammeup.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Veeam Backup &#38; Replication 4 » VeeamMeUp -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://veeammeup.com/2009/11/veeam-backup-replication-4.html/comment-page-1#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Veeam Backup &#38; Replication 4 » VeeamMeUp -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veeammeup.com/?p=176#comment-192</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Doug Hazelman, tscalzott. tscalzott said: RT @VMDoug: New blog post (and new look) - Veeam Backup &amp; Replication 4, answering the critics: http://bit.ly/6quvVC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Doug Hazelman, tscalzott. tscalzott said: RT @VMDoug: New blog post (and new look) &#8211; Veeam Backup &amp; Replication 4, answering the critics: <a href="http://bit.ly/6quvVC" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6quvVC</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
